分析ARCH wait on SENDREQ等待事件

本篇内容介绍了“分析ARCH wait on SENDREQ等待事件”的有关知识，在实际案例的操作过程中，不少人都会遇到这样的困境，接下来就让小编带领大家学习一下如何处理这些情况吧！希望大家仔细阅读，能够学有所成！客户库，AWR报告采样间隔8小时，ARCH wait on SENDREQ等待事件平均等待时间较长，约3秒。恰巧告警日志中提示无法分配日志，虽然archive_lag_target参数设置较小（为900），但是数据库有5个重做日志组，按理说应该不会出现无法分配日志组的情况出现。由于这个等待事件的出现，故猜想主备库之间的网络可能较差，导致主库的归档无法及时归档到备库上，从而引发cannot allocate new log。Tue Jul 19 22:19:33 2011
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 26887
Private strand flush not complete从Metalink（MOS）上可查到如下关于ARCH wait on SENDREQ等待事件的信息《Data Guard Wait Events》“ARCH wait on SENDREQ” This wait event monitorsthe amount of time spent by all archiver processes to write the received redo to diskas well as open and close the remote archived redo logs.《Troubleshooting 9i Data Guard Network Issues》The ‘ARCH wait on SENDREQ’ waitevent increases during a log switch period. This event’s average wait time also increases as the network round trip time (RTT) increases.If this wait event is in the top 5, then it may be indicative of a saturated network or a poorly configured network. Also, make sure that enough redo log groups are configured so that any delay in remote archiving does not result in a hung database due to no available online redo logs.在log switch阶段会出现ARCH wait on SENDREQ等待事件，如果此事件出现在Top5等待事件中，说明网络满负载或网络配置问题（总之，网络较差）还有一篇，说是metalink上的，不过没找到原文：1)It means that there is aslow networkbetween primary and standby database.2)It also means that there is a chance ofslow performance on dis免费主机域名kwhere remote archiving is happening.Solution：1.Please get in touch with your network admin andcheck the network response.2.If the remote destination is slow and archiver is taking longer to archive to that destination, then the user needs toallocate more redo log groupsso that there is a logfile available for a logswitch to switch into, and not wait for the archiver to finish archiving to the destination.3.One more workaround you can use is to set below parameter in primary site:_LOG_ARCHIVE_CALLOUT=’LOCAL_FIRST=TRUE’第三种解决方案提示修改隐含参数：_LOG_ARCHIVE_CALLOUT_LOG_ARCHIVE_CALLOUT=’LOCAL_FIRST=TRUE’If the above parameter is set then theARCH process will begin archiving to the local destination first. Once the redo log has been completely andsuccessfully archived to at least one localdestination, it willthen be transmitted to the remote destination. This is the default behavior. beginning with
OracleDatabase
10gRelease 1.Starting in 9.2.0.7 patchsets, one ARCH process will begin acting as a ‘dedicated’ archiver, handling only local archival duties. It will not perform. remote log shipping or service FAL requests. This is a backport of behavior. from 10gR1 to 9iR2.我对上文This is the default behavior. beginning with
OracleDatabase
10gRelease 1.表示质疑，因为从我本地11.2.0.1的库来看，此隐免费主机域名含参数默认还是空。尝试在非生产库上修改此隐含参数做测试：SQL> set linesize 132
SQL> column name format a30
SQL> column value format a25
SQL> select
2 x.ksppinm name,
3 y.ksppstvl value,
4 y.ksppstdf isdefault,
5 decode(bitand(y.ksppstvf,7),1,’MODIFIED’,4,’SYSTEM_MOD’,’FALSE’) ismod,
6 decode(bitand(y.ksppstvf,2),2,’TRUE’,’FALSE’) isadj
7 from
8 sys.x$ksppi x,
9 sys.x$ksppcv y
10 where
11 x.inst_id = userenv(‘Instance’) and
12 y.inst_id = userenv(‘Instance’) and
13 x.indx = y.indx and
14 x.ksppinm like ‘%_&par%’
15 order by
16 translate(x.ksppinm, ‘ _’, ‘ ‘)
17 /
输入 par 的值: callout
原值 14: x.ksppinm like ‘%_&par%’
新值 14: x.ksppinm like ‘%_callout%’NAME VALUE ISDEFAULT ISMOD ISADJ
—————————— ————————- ——— ———- —–
_log_archive_callout TRUE FALSE FALSESQL> alter system set “_log_archive_callout”=’LOCAL_FIRST=TRUE’;系统已更改。SQL> set linesize 132
SQL> column name format a30
SQL> column value format a25
SQL> select
2 x.ksppinm name,
3 y.ksppstvl value,
4 y.ksppstdf isdefault,
5 decode(bitand(y.ksppstvf,7),1,’MODIFIED’,4,’SYSTEM_MOD’,’FALSE’) ismod,
6 decode(bitand(y.ksppstvf,2),2,’TRUE’,’FALSE’) isadj
7 from
8 sys.x$ksppi x,
9 sys.x$ksppcv y
10 where
11 x.inst_id = userenv(‘Instance’) and
12 y.inst_id = userenv(‘Instance’) and
13 x.indx = y.indx and
14 x.ksppinm like ‘%_&par%’
15 order by
16 translate(x.ksppinm, ‘ _’, ‘ ‘)
17 /
输入 par 的值: callout
原值 14: x.ksppinm like ‘%_&par%’
新值 14: x.ksppinm like ‘%_callout%’NAME VALUE ISDEFAULT ISMOD ISADJ
—————————— ————————- ——— ———- —–
_log_archive_callout LOCAL_FIRST=TRUE TRUE SYSTEM_MOD FALSE综上：我认为应该仔细检查一下用户主备库网络情况，检查客户备库磁盘IO。“分析ARCH wait on SENDREQ等待事件”的内容就介绍到这里了，感谢大家的阅读。如果想了解更多行业相关的知识可以关注云技术网站，小编将为大家输出更多高质量的实用文章！

相关推荐: 怎么理解数据库中的过程与函数

这篇文章主要介绍“怎么理解数据库中的过程与函数”，在日常操作中，相信很多人在怎么理解数据库中的过程与函数问题上存在疑惑，小编查阅了各式资料，整理出简单好用的操作方法，希望对大家解答”怎么理解数据库中的过程与函免费主机域名数”的疑惑有所帮助！接下来，请跟着小编一…